Continuous Improvement/Claims
NOTOC UPDATE: We are in the middle of building a complete repository of improvement claims. The Puget Sound Partnership has been mining critiques of the Puget Sound Recovery system from over the last 10 years (we found 30 publications!) Most of the claims from these reports are limited to a sentence or two of text, and are vague and simplistic—not sufficient to guide improvement. While some of these claims are unique to the Puget Sound, we believe the themes and issues are common to all ecosystem management settings.
We have peeled out a set of claims that relate to our Planning and Funding System. are using the results of this archival work to facilitate a conversation
Relationships
- related to: canty 2015
- related to: continuous improvement
- related to: epa
- related to: french creek drainage management
- related to: large project budget standards
- related to: lios
- related to: mickelson 2009
- related to: sahandy & daily 2014
- related to: section 408
- related to: snohomish conservation district
- related to: the nature conservancy
- related to: washington state department of ecology